Watch: Elizabeth Warren Completely Loses It When RFK Jr. Points Out She's Shilling for Big Pharma

Watch: Elizabeth Warren Completely Loses It When RFK Jr. Points Out She's Shilling for Big Pharma

Reckless and morally compromised senators will invite mockery and potentially face electoral consequences if they choose to oppose Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

That said, Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has long revealed herself as a dishonest, loud, overly dramatic, and self-righteous figure.

During a Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday, President Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., provoked an outburst from Warren by highlighting how she had framed her questioning in a way that effectively served the interests of major pharmaceutical companies—entities that have significantly contributed to her political career.

Kennedy, of course, expressed this point with more diplomacy. But the implication was clear.

Warren addressed Kennedy—the former Democrat-turned-independent presidential candidate—in the same sanctimonious manner she often employs against Republican nominees, implying that financial gain motivates everyone in politics except herself.

“Mr. Kennedy, will you also agree that you won’t take any compensation from any lawsuits against drug companies while you are secretary and for four years afterwards?” she demanded.

Notice the phrase “four years afterwards.” No ethics regulation mandates that Kennedy abstain from earning money from private legal cases after leaving public office. If such a rule existed, Warren wouldn’t have needed to phrase her question that way.

“Well, I’ll certainly commit to that while I’m secretary,” Kennedy responded, offering the only reasonable answer.

But when he attempted to clarify his position against Warren’s broader, dubious implications, she repeatedly cut him off. Unsatisfied with his initial response, she pressed him two more times.

By the third attempt, Kennedy had enough. He directly confronted her underlying intent.

“You’re asking me to not sue drug companies, and I’m not gonna agree to that, senator,” he stated.

“No, you can sue drug companies as much as you want,” Warren hastily countered. Applause from the gallery in support of Kennedy may have helped curtail her remarks.

The Massachusetts senator—often mocked as “Pocahontas” by Trump supporters due to her disputed claims of Native American heritage—then launched into two lengthy, impassioned speeches that sounded eerily aligned with pharmaceutical industry talking points.

At the end of her initial pro-vaccine monologue, Warren circled back to her original question. Kennedy, of course, gave the same response. This time, her frustration escalated noticeably.

“Senator, you’re asking me not to sue vaccine—pharmaceutical companies,” Kennedy reiterated.

“No I am not!” Warren shot back, gritting her teeth.

“Yeah, you are. That’s exactly what you’re doing.”

At that moment, it was almost as if steam was visibly rising from Warren—not from an external source, but from sheer exasperation.

Readers can view the entire exchange in the YouTube clip below. The relevant discussion begins around the 2:20 mark and continues for over four minutes.

According to OpenSecrets data, Warren was among the top recipients of campaign contributions from pharmaceutical giant Pfizer during the 2020 election cycle, with only two senators receiving more. Leading the list was independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, followed by Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia—both of whom have similarly positioned themselves as champions of the people while benefiting from corporate donations.

As Warren’s performance made clear, the Democratic Party has fully aligned itself with the interests of Big Pharma.

Fortunately, billionaire entrepreneur and former Democratic donor Nicole Shanahan—who is now Kennedy’s 2024 running mate and a rising star among Trump supporters—has pledged to fund primary challengers against any of the 13 senators, including Sanders, who might oppose Kennedy’s confirmation.

Warren was not named among those 13, likely because she holds a secure seat in overwhelmingly Democratic Massachusetts.

Nonetheless, the more aggressively Warren and others push back against Kennedy, the more evident it becomes to voters that many of their elected officials prioritize corporate interests over the well-being of ordinary Americans.

Subscribe to Lib Fails

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe