For a president whose mental and physical decline was painfully obvious to the American people, perhaps the biggest scandal of Joe Biden’s presidency isn’t what he said — but what (or rather, who) signed his name.

Enter the autopen — a mechanical device designed to replicate a person’s signature. It’s long existed in Washington but had rarely made headlines. That is, until the final months of Biden’s disastrous lone term in office.

As Biden’s health collapsed under the weight of a devastating cancer diagnosis and mounting public blunders, his signature was — curiously — more active than ever. In fact, the machine-generated signature appeared on everything from routine proclamations to major policy measures, prompting serious questions: Who was making decisions, and who was signing off on them?

According to a report by The Washington Times, the Oversight Project has uncovered a disturbing trend: at least three distinct autopen signatures were used under Biden's name — an irregularity never before seen on this scale.

“The uniformity of these signatures on these proclamations led us to conclude with high confidence that there is a third autopen signature,” said Kyle Brosnan, VP of legal at the Oversight Project.

Three separate signatures. One president. No transparency.

While Biden loyalists might try to shrug this off as “normal,” the truth is, this isn’t normal. The American people didn’t elect a committee to sit in the Oval Office with a robot pen.

And even if multiple autopen signatures were technically legal, the implications remain damning: Was the Biden White House operating without a functioning president at the helm — and without telling the country?

Rep. James Comer (R-KY) has launched investigations into this mystery, demanding answers the White House refuses to give. Meanwhile, whispers in the halls of D.C. suggest other prominent Democrats — including Sen. Elizabeth Warren — may have had a hand in these behind-the-scenes operations.

And yet, no serious explanation has been offered.

Biden defenders may claim this is much ado about nothing. But that doesn’t explain why the autopen only ramped up after the president’s condition visibly worsened — nor does it justify the secrecy behind using three mechanical variations of his signature.

This isn’t conspiracy — it’s optics, and the optics are terrible. Americans expect a president who’s present, not one who’s being propped up by aides and rubber-stamped into history.

Once again, it’s Republicans digging for the truth while Democrats bury their heads and hope the press doesn’t ask too many questions.

But voters are watching — and in an era when trust in institutions is at an all-time low, robot pens and ghost presidents aren’t the path to restoring credibility.