Full ‘Epstein List’ Gets Released By Trump Administration

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Saturday that the Department of Justice has fully complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, releasing all materials covered under the statute — including a list of more than 300 high-profile individuals whose names appear in the records.

In a formal letter to congressional leaders, Bondi stated that the department made public “all records, documents, communications and investigative materials” in its possession that fall within nine categories specified by law. She emphasized that nothing was withheld for reasons of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.

The letter, addressed to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Ranking Member Dick Durbin, D-Ill., House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, D-Md., was obtained by Fox News Digital.

“In accordance with the requirements of the Act, and as described in various Department submissions to the courts of the Southern District of New York assigned to the Epstein and Maxwell prosecutions and related orders, the Department released all ‘records, documents, communications and investigative materials in the possession of the Department’ that ‘relate to’ any of nine different categories,” the letter stated, per Fox.

Among the more than 300 names included in the materials are President Donald J. Trump, former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama, Prince Harry, Bill Gates, Woody Allen, Kim Kardashian, Kurt Cobain, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bruce Springsteen.

Under the bipartisan transparency measure — signed into law by President Trump during his second term after clearing Congress — the released list includes “all persons where (1) they are or were a government official or politically exposed person and (2) their name appears in the files released under the Act at least once,” the letter explained. It further noted that the names appear in a “wide variety of contexts.”

According to the letter, some individuals had “extensive direct email contact with Epstein or Maxwell,” while others were mentioned “in a portion of a document (including press reporting) that on its face is unrelated to the Epstein and Maxwell matters.”

The released materials encompass records related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, along with references to individuals — potentially including public officials — connected to Epstein’s activities. The production also includes documentation tied to civil settlements and legal resolutions, such as immunity deals, plea agreements, non-prosecution agreements, and sealed arrangements, Fox reported.

Additionally, the release contains internal DOJ emails, memoranda, and meeting notes reflecting prosecutorial decisions — whether to charge, decline prosecution, or pursue investigative avenues. The materials also address issues surrounding the potential destruction or concealment of records connected to Epstein’s detention and death, including incident reports, witness interviews, and medical examiner documentation.

The letter makes clear: “No records were withheld or redacted ‘on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.'”

It further states, “Any omissions from the list are unintentional and, as explained in the previous letters to Congress, a result of the volume and speed with which the Department complied with the Act. Individuals whose names were redacted for law-enforcement sensitive purposes are not included.”

Bondi’s announcement follows months of phased document releases as the department worked to meet statutory deadlines while protecting sensitive information, including the identities of victims.

The disclosure has already prompted renewed scrutiny from lawmakers and advocacy organizations, who have questioned the pace of prior productions, the scope of redactions, and how individual names are contextualized within the broader record. Congressional oversight efforts remain ongoing, though it is unclear whether further investigative steps will follow this latest comprehensive release.

For supporters of the transparency law, the move represents a significant test of whether Washington is prepared to provide full public accountability in one of the most scrutinized criminal cases in modern history — without shielding powerful figures from exposure.