Sickening Video: Every American Should Hear Anti-ICEer's Comment on Little Girl Who Was Raped by Illegal
A disturbing confrontation captured on video is reigniting debate over the increasingly hostile activism directed at federal immigration officers — and raising deeper questions about how radical political rhetoric is shaping public behavior.
In footage posted Feb. 13 to X, a woman identified as Olivia Jensen is seen engaging in a tense exchange with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents during what appeared to be an active operation. Based on the conversation, Jensen had reportedly been following the agents in her vehicle, potentially attempting to monitor or interfere with their enforcement activity.
The situation escalated after one agent conducted a check of Jensen’s identification. Though the officer remained calm and professional, Jensen responded with visible hostility.
In a portion of the video, one agent is heard telling his colleague, “Oh no, she doesn’t care.”
“She doesn’t care?” the second agent asked.
“She doesn’t care. They never do,” the first agent replied.
Moments later, the second agent approached Jensen’s vehicle and attempted to explain the gravity of the situation.
“You know,” he said, “we were trying to get a child molester, right?”
Jensen pushed back.
“No you weren’t,” she replied.
The agent continued, attempting to provide more context.
“And then, his plate came back as murder,” he said. “But you guys don’t care.”
The exchange then took a troubling turn.
“How’s it feel to be a race traitor?” Jensen asked the agent — a remark that drew widespread condemnation online.
Rather than escalating the confrontation, the agent stayed composed and continued speaking calmly.
“So you know,” another officer added, “this isn’t a good look for you.”
“You think I care about my look?” Jensen replied.
“No, oh no no, trust me, it is evident by how you look you don’t care,” the officer responded. “We get that. Trust me. No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m just saying this, trying to be a social warrior, if you actually cared, you probably would care about the child who got raped and also the person who got murdered by the person that we were looking for. But see, you don’t care.”
“No I don’t care,” she replied.
ICE: “This isn't a good look for you”
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) February 13, 2026
LIB: “You think I care about my look?”
ICE: “No, it's evident by how you look, you don’t care. Trust me. If you cared you would care about the child who got raped and the person who got murdered by the person we're looking for”
SAVAGE🔥 pic.twitter.com/Ioqn9jYqoo
The clip concludes with Jensen launching into a broader critique of ICE, repeating familiar Democratic talking points about enforcement practices. The agent ultimately shook his head and disengaged.
The confrontation comes amid a broader climate of escalating tension surrounding immigration enforcement. Under President Donald J. Trump’s second term, federal authorities have renewed emphasis on enforcing existing immigration law — particularly targeting individuals with serious criminal records.
Supporters of the administration argue that the federal government has both a constitutional obligation and a moral duty to protect American communities from violent offenders, regardless of immigration status. They contend that rhetoric portraying ICE as inherently malicious has emboldened activists to obstruct or harass agents carrying out lawful duties.
Critics of progressive immigration policies point to a pattern: demonize enforcement, minimize criminal conduct, and frame officers as villains rather than public servants. In doing so, they argue, political leaders risk creating an atmosphere where hostility toward law enforcement becomes normalized.
The video has sparked intense online debate. Many observers expressed concern not only over the racial slur directed at the agent, but also over the apparent indifference to allegations involving rape and murder.
At its core, the incident highlights a widening cultural divide over immigration, law enforcement, and accountability. While activists argue they are standing up for vulnerable communities, others see a troubling willingness to overlook serious crimes in pursuit of ideological goals.
As the national conversation over border security and public safety continues, moments like this underscore how deeply entrenched — and emotionally charged — the issue has become.