Trump's Supreme Court Win Triggers Embarrassing Response from Keith Olbermann

The Supreme Court dismissed the attempts by Democrats across several states to prevent former President Donald Trump from appearing on presidential primary ballots in a unanimous ruling announced on Monday.
In its ruling, the court stated that only Congress, not individual states, has the authority to hold candidates accountable for "insurrection" under the 14th Amendment.
Upon learning of the decision, left-leaning individuals in Maine, Colorado, and other states who had sought to exclude Trump from the ballot likely reacted with frustration. However, none seemed to exhibit a response as extreme as that of Keith Olbermann, a former sports commentator turned political commentator, who took to X to express his outrage shortly after the court's ruling was released.
The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy. Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. And collectively the "court" has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate.
— Keith Olbermann⌚️ (@KeithOlbermann) March 4, 2024
It must be dissolved.
Olbermann's statement, claiming that the Supreme Court had betrayed democracy and accusing specific justices of incompetence and corruption, drew attention for its intensity. His refusal to even consider the possibility that his viewpoint might lack sufficient understanding or merit raises questions about his motives.
Even if the decision had been split 6-3 along ideological lines, Olbermann's argument would still lack credibility. To disregard the unanimous agreement of nine legal and constitutional experts suggests an inflated sense of self-importance, ignorance, or denial on Olbermann's part.
According to Olbermann, not only are these nine individuals unfit to serve on the court, but they also lack basic reading comprehension skills. His proposed solution—to dissolve the court—flies in the face of the fundamental principles of the separation of powers established by the nation's founders, which aim to maintain three equally influential branches of government.
While the idea of abolishing the court is inherently perilous, particularly when proposed by someone lacking credibility, social media largely responded to Olbermann's post with disdain, offering little respect for his viewpoint.
Fortunately, Olbermann has not yet indicated any intention to leave the country should Trump win the upcoming election and return to the White House. However, if he does, there may be individuals willing to support his relocation efforts, given the enthusiasm expressed for his departure in response to his inflammatory remarks.
Have you tried crying more?
— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) March 4, 2024
So women have color have poor reading skills and can't compete with the brain power of a white man like you? Wow, Keith.
— Damin Toell (@damintoell) March 4, 2024
You are an angry, sad, spiteful little man.
— Amy Curtis 🇮🇱 (@RantyAmyCurtis) March 4, 2024
I guess you could move to another country where they don't have elections or a Supreme Court I hear Ukraine is nice this time of year
— USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸 (@Arkypatriot) March 4, 2024