Trump Official Alleges Sen. Elizabeth Warren Was Secretly Signing for Biden With Autopen

In a revelation that adds fuel to the ongoing concerns about the Biden administration's transparency, one of President Donald Trump’s former top officials made a stunning allegation about who may have really been pulling the strings inside the White House — and it wasn’t Joe Biden.

David Sacks, who served as President Trump’s lead on cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, recently appeared on Jesse Watters Primetime on Fox News, where he casually asserted that far-left Senator Elizabeth Warren was the one “controlling the autopen” during Biden’s presidency.

The remark, though brief, raises serious legal and constitutional questions about the legitimacy of official actions signed in Biden’s name — especially in the later stages of his term, when concerns about his declining health became impossible to ignore.

As public scrutiny intensifies following revelations from a forthcoming tell-all and a deeply troubling report on Biden’s health — including claims that he has been battling aggressive prostate cancer that has metastasized to his bones — both critics and supporters have reacted with a mix of sympathy and growing unease.

Initially, the nation responded with heartfelt condolences and well-wishes for the former president and his family. But soon after, Americans began to ask the uncomfortable but necessary question: If Biden was incapacitated or in steep decline, who was truly making decisions in the Oval Office?

Much of the speculation has zeroed in on the use of an autopen, a device that can replicate a signature and has been used for years to expedite the signing of routine government documents. In this case, however, the suggestion isn’t about efficiency — it’s about legitimacy.

If Biden’s inner circle, or worse, outside political operatives, used the autopen to authorize executive actions, pardons, or regulations without his direct consent or oversight, it would represent a constitutional crisis of the highest order. And the courts may ultimately need to determine whether any such signatures were even valid under U.S. law.

During his Fox News appearance, Sacks didn’t mince words when pointing to Warren as the real force behind some of Biden’s more aggressive regulatory stances — particularly on cryptocurrency.

“[Cryptocurrency] is the financial system of the future, Jesse,” Sacks said. “And we have to encourage it. What the Biden administration was doing — and let’s face it, it wasn’t Biden — Elizabeth Warren controlled the autopen during that administration.”

“She, for some reason, has this pathological hatred of the crypto community,” Sacks continued. “She wants to drive this community offshore, she doesn’t want it happening in the United States. That’s the wrong policy for the United States.”

WATCH:

If true, Sacks’ allegation that Warren was effectively signing executive orders in Biden’s name could amount not only to political manipulation — but potential fraud. At the very least, it raises ethical questions about who had access to the instruments of executive power in an administration marred by secrecy and health-related speculation.

Senator Warren has yet to comment on the accusation, and she has not faced any legal consequences or charges related to using the autopen on behalf of the former president. Still, her silence will likely do little to quiet the growing calls for an investigation.

The American people deserve answers. Who was really in control at the White House? And how far did the deception go?